This is a response to an article by Taryn Isaacs De Vega
Taking the baton from the 1976 generation
The youth as
drivers of educational transformation in South Africa
Published in The Journalist – Context Matters
“Does our research
further emphasises [sic] the South African context or simply duplicate European
knowledge?”
This question from the author embodies the essence of the
article.
Other than being wanting grammatically, it misses many
points and generates even more questions and concerns.
First, why should research at South African universities need
to “further emphasize” anything, especially “context” in South Africa or any
geographically exclusive area?
Second, is the author suggesting that current research at
South African universities largely “duplicates European knowledge”?
Research should answer questions, solve problems, challenge
myth and dogma and, ultimately find progressive and innovative pathways to the
elusive “Truth”. It should be both
predictive and testable. Too often
today, the word “context” is used to ‘justify’ action or inaction that fails to
meet these criteria or, worse still, rejects other more plausible research that
doesn’t ‘fit in’.
As an evolutionary and conservation biologist employed in an
institute of African ornithology at the University of Cape Town, I spent more
than four decades using birds (mainly chicken-like members of the avian Order
Galliformes) to investigate the biological nature of ‘race’, species,
speciation and wise use of gamebirds (e.g. guineafowls, francolins and
spurfowls) to the benefit of humanity - intellectually and materially.
On 3 July 2017, Dr Tshifhiwa Mandiwana-Neudani (a former
post-graduate student and now colleague at the University of Limpopo) and I
will be co-presenting a plenary address at the conference of the Southern
African Society for Systematic Biology that summarizes her and my key findings
from research on francolins and spurfowls.
One (of many) key findings is the unexpected discovery that three
long-evolutionarily-enigmatic African species (one of which was only discovered
in the 1990s) are the African remnants of lineages that gave rise to most of
the world’s remaining gamebirds: chickens, peafowls, pheasants, quails, grouse
and turkeys.
This research would have been impossible without
collaborating with South African, other African, European, and North/South
American colleagues and students, and hundreds of hours working with specimens
housed in colonial-established Euro-American museums.
Indeed, rather than “duplicating” the findings of Europeans,
we refute many of them.
Furthermore, Dr Rob Little, a co-author of this research
(also a former post-graduate student and past Director of Conservation at WWF –
South Africa) co-supervised conservation-related research on francolins and
spurfowls that supplements the incomes of South African farmers and their
workers.
So, rather than implementing ‘decolonization’ to strip our
progressive university students and researchers of ideas and approaches simply
because they were developed in Europe or non-South Africa, let them forage out
the ones that complement resilient indigenous knowledge to help do real,
Afro-relevant research and provide education for the generations to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment