‘Decolonizing’
the University of Cape Town (UCT): means to an end or just the end?
Two
scenarios
Emeritus
Prof. Tim Crowe
The two
Fallist movements to date at UCT have addressed colonial symbols and fees. Both of these issues could be solved easily –
remove all symbols and charge no fees. Don’t
hold your breath on this. People will
always have heroes and it’s crazy not to use fees generated from wealthy
students to subsidize the poorest-of-the-poor.
The real
mammoth in the room at UCT that no one seems to be addressing coherently is “decolonization”
in all its guises. Until it is defined
and implemented, there will be no peace at UCT.
My goal here
is to present two scenarios. First, is
one for radical decolonization based on the results of a decolonization-themed
assembly for all its students and staff convened by the Faculty of
Humanities https://www.uct.ac.za/dailynews/?id=9303, bits and pieces I’ve picked up en passant and two recent publications
by eminent decolonizer professors.
Between the public intellectual and the scholar: decolonization and
some post-independence initiatives in African higher education.
|
Mamdani, Mahmood
|
Inter-Asia Cultural Studies. 2016.
17 (1): 68-83.
|
|
Decolonizing the university: New directions
Achille Joseph
Mbembe
Arts & Humanities in Higher
Education. 2016. 15(1) 29–45.
The other is derived from my own
thoughts and discussions with UCT academics and students from its “silenced
majority”.
I do this under a series of headings
Radical decolonization
Centralized
administration
Reduce its staff
dramatically by making it follow UCT’s first registrar’s dictum: “Justify your
existence”. Maximally devolve
administrative/academic control to better-staffed faculties.
Faculties/Departments
Take out
‘uni’ and create a “pluriversity”. Deconstruct
and democratize both entities as much as possible, reducing their pedagogical
isolation, hierarchical structure and subject focus. Reduce powers of the deans and professors. Require departments to ‘democratize’ and ‘inclusivize’
curricula, e.g. by incorporating elements that involve socio-economic
experiences and politics of oppressed masses into courses in faculties outside
the Humanities.
Appointments
and promotion
De-emphasize/remove
hierarchical barriers between academic and professional, administrative and
support staff (PASS). Review currently
employed academics and re-educate or retrench those deemed to be sexist/racists
(even acting covertly). Aggressively
recruit demographically under-represented academics, especially ‘black’
women. Place high weighting on
applicants’ “lived experiences” and cultural sensitivity. With regard to ad hominem promotion, especially to full professor, strong
performance with regard to hard-to-measure criteria (e.g. contribution to
cultural development, popularity amongst undergraduate students/junior-staff
and assessments by self-selected referees) should be allowed to offset
relatively poor performance as educators (no Distinguished Teacher Award) and
researchers (no or low rating by the National Research Foundation or citation
impact index). In short, “scholars”
should be replaced by “organic intellectuals” who conduct significant amounts
of politically correct research warranting publication only in the social media
and not in peer-reviewed publications.
Teaching and
curricula
There should
be much more emphasis placed on African language as a medium of communication/instruction
in general and subject material in particular.
There should be no “extended-degree programme” that forces students to
conduct their undergraduate education beyond the requisite three years. It ‘stigmatizes’ black students. Teaching approaches should de-emphasize
academic ‘adversarialism‘ by promoting broader epistemic ‘tolerance’ of
potentially competing paradigms.
Euro-American-biased elements in curricula should be dropped and
replaced by Afrocentric alternatives, e.g. those suggested by Mamdani in his proposed
social studies foundation course, "Problematizing Africa", and by offering undergraduate
degree programmes in African Studies.
More emphasis should be placed on African pre-colonial history (e.g.
going back to Pharaonic Egypt) and de-emphasizing current approaches that
‘exceptionalize’ South Africa vis-à-vis Africa north of the Limpopo.
Evolution-related
teaching/research should deal decisively with issues relating evolutionary
teleology (goal-directedness) and to the origins and diversity of hominins in
general and ‘race’ in particular. Most
importantly, curricula should be adapted to allow ALL students the opportunity
to complete their undergraduate research within the requisite time, earn high
marks and feel fully ‘at home’, even if this requires the designation of “safe
spaces” for self-identified groups.
Adaptive transformation
Centralized
administration
Reduce its
staff complement dramatically by making it follow UCT’s first registrar’s
dictum: “Justify your existence”.
Maximally devolve administrative/academic control to better-staffed faculties.
Faculties/Departments
Retain
existing faculties. Identify core departments
designated using internationally recognized pedagogical/epistemological
requirements AND national needs (especially relating to the eradication of
poverty). Deans must be internationally
highly respected educators, administrators and researchers so they can lead by
example. Research excellence should be
determined by unbiased review by epistemic peers (e.g. NRF-rating and h
index). Educational excellence should be
based on well-designed student/local-peer evaluation, earning Distinguished
Teacher Awards and producing graduates and postgraduates who establish
themselves as leaders in the public/academic/private sectors. Reward, in terms of financial and staffing
resources, high-performing (measured by quantity/quality of graduates and
peer-reviewed research) departments, without emasculating those deemed to be
essential to an internationally respected university. Increase the powers of Deans and HODs,
holding them accountable to meeting pre-set academic targets.
Promote
synergistic collaboration between willing individuals and educational/research
units. But, no enforced academic
‘collaboration’.
Appointments
and promotion
De-emphasize/remove
hierarchical barriers between academic and professional, administrative and
support staff (PASS). PASS staff should
be encouraged to become co-authors of publications to which they
contribute. Eliminate tenure (effective
employment for life) for academics, requiring them to undergo rigorous periodic
peer review.
Review
currently employed academics and re-educate or retrench those deemed to be
sexist/racists.
Identify and, if
necessary, discipline those who use ad
hominem or politically motivated attack and defamation when they fail in
rational debate. The other principle that I’d resurrect from
the Sir Jock Beattie, UCT’s first VC, is his firm insistence on “decent
behaviour” by his students/staff. What I
and others experienced during the recent Annual General Meeting of the UCT
Convocation
was anything but “robust critique” by respectful,
disciplined protesters. It was vulgar,
hate-speech and intimidation by invading “abantu behlanye nebekhanda behlaza”.
Aggressively
recruit demographically under-represented academics, especially ‘black’
women. Place and reward (financially)
applicants when they apply their “lived experience” and cultural sensitivity to
help oppressed students to succeed. With
regard to ad hominem promotion,
especially to full professor, strong, indisputable performance as BOTH
educators and researchers should be non-negotiable. In short, “scholars” should be remain scholars
who are required to publish their research findings responsibly in top international
publications and where appropriate in the social media.
Teaching and
curricula
There should
be much more emphasis placed on African language supporting notes to facilitate
communication in general and subject material in particular. There should be no “extended-degree
programme” since it ‘stigmatizes’ black students. Rather, academically disabled matriculants
(ADM) should be mentored and counselled by BOTH Academic Development and Core
academics throughout their undergraduate careers, including involving them as
research assistants and, potentially, as co-authors of publications.
Teaching
approaches should contrast potentially ‘adversarial‘ academic paradigms by identifying
their comparative strengths and weaknesses and let students to choose amongst
them.
Euro-American elements in curricula should be
stripped of their racially biased components, or dropped and replaced by more
persuasive Afrocentric alternatives that place South Africa into a pre-colonial historical context,
de-emphasizing current approaches that ‘exceptionalize’ South Africa vis-à-vis
Africa north of the Limpopo.
Evolution-related teaching/research should deal decisively with issues
relating evolutionary teleology (goal-directedness) and to the origins and diversity
of hominins in general and ‘race’ in particular. Most importantly, curricula (supplemented by
requisite mentoring/counselling) should be adapted constructively to allow ALL
students the opportunity to complete their undergraduate research within the
requisite time, earn high marks and feel fully ‘at home’, in jointly shared
space. Politics should have no place in
educator-student interactions.
Now for the
hard one.
Academically
disabled matriculants (ADM) need (in the light of to 30+ years of Academic
Support/Development experience) to have their population filtered further and
reduced to admit numbers that can be coped with by the combined forces of Core
and ASD academics available. If the
current practice of admitting large numbers of ADM is continued, especially
under radical decolonization, they and UCT are doomed.
Let’s hear
some comments from Fallists, their supporters in the UCT Executive and the
Black Academic Caucus and, of course from others in the “Silenced Majority”
that I may have miss-represented.
No comments:
Post a Comment